Loders' Neighbourhood Plan has passed its Examination. Congratulations to all involved! The next step will be a local referendum. As long as enough local residents vote 'yes', the Neighbourhood Plan should then become the second 'made' plan in Dorset.
Claire Wright undertook the examination over the Christmas period, and commended the extent to which the group had reached out to its community and was an inherently community-driven document, and the fact that the plan was clear, concise (at just under 30 pages) and easy to understand. She has suggested some very minor modifications, none of which fundamentally change the Plan's contents or direction. The District Council will formally consider her report in March.
It is likely that the referendum will be held on 5 May, to combine with the Police and Crime Commissioner elections on that date.
Sunday, 28 February 2016
Wednesday, 17 February 2016
Neighbourhood plans and housing land supply
The guidance supporting national planning policy has been
updated this month, with some notable additions on housing and neighbourhood
plans. There are three key messages
coming through, which reinforce what I have been advising local groups:
(1) If a neighbourhood plan is looking at housing or settlement boundaries, it is critical that it takes into account the housing needs for the area, both from district-wide and (if possible) locally sourced evidence.
(2) Do not take the settlement boundary for granted, as it may not count in the absence of a five year housing land supply at a district level – so if there are key spaces and places to protect outside of the boundary which are not otherwise subject to a designation, these should be highlighted in your plans. Any locally sourced information on housing needs can also be used in planning decisions when there is a lack of a housing land supply.
(3) Local Plans are likely to get reviewed and allocate additional sites at some point in the future - neighbourhood plans can influence these future decisions, for example by allocating reserve sites to ensure that any future needs can be met.
--------------------------------
For those that want to read on – the relevant extracts are:
“Up-to-date housing needs evidence is relevant to the question of whether a housing supply policy in a neighbourhood plan or Order contributes to the achievement of sustainable development”
“Where the local planning authority cannot demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable housing sites, decision makers may still give weight to relevant policies in the emerging neighbourhood plan, even though these policies should not be considered up-to-date … Documentation produced in support of or in response to emerging neighbourhood plans … may also be of assistance to decision makers in their deliberations”
When there is a lack of a 5 year housing land supply in the local plan area neighbourhood plan policies restricting housing supply will be “out of date”, and as such “the presumption in favour of sustainable development requires the granting of planning permission, unless any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole; or specific policies in the Framework indicate development should be restricted” “Decision makers should include within their assessment those policies in the Framework that deal with neighbourhood planning … which states that where a planning application conflicts with a neighbourhood plan that has been brought into force, planning permission should not normally be granted.”
“Neighbourhood plans should consider providing indicative delivery timetables, and allocating reserve sites to ensure that emerging evidence of housing need is addressed. This can help minimise potential conflicts and ensure that policies in the neighbourhood plan are not overridden by a new Local Plan.”
(1) If a neighbourhood plan is looking at housing or settlement boundaries, it is critical that it takes into account the housing needs for the area, both from district-wide and (if possible) locally sourced evidence.
(2) Do not take the settlement boundary for granted, as it may not count in the absence of a five year housing land supply at a district level – so if there are key spaces and places to protect outside of the boundary which are not otherwise subject to a designation, these should be highlighted in your plans. Any locally sourced information on housing needs can also be used in planning decisions when there is a lack of a housing land supply.
(3) Local Plans are likely to get reviewed and allocate additional sites at some point in the future - neighbourhood plans can influence these future decisions, for example by allocating reserve sites to ensure that any future needs can be met.
--------------------------------
For those that want to read on – the relevant extracts are:
“Up-to-date housing needs evidence is relevant to the question of whether a housing supply policy in a neighbourhood plan or Order contributes to the achievement of sustainable development”
“Where the local planning authority cannot demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable housing sites, decision makers may still give weight to relevant policies in the emerging neighbourhood plan, even though these policies should not be considered up-to-date … Documentation produced in support of or in response to emerging neighbourhood plans … may also be of assistance to decision makers in their deliberations”
When there is a lack of a 5 year housing land supply in the local plan area neighbourhood plan policies restricting housing supply will be “out of date”, and as such “the presumption in favour of sustainable development requires the granting of planning permission, unless any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole; or specific policies in the Framework indicate development should be restricted” “Decision makers should include within their assessment those policies in the Framework that deal with neighbourhood planning … which states that where a planning application conflicts with a neighbourhood plan that has been brought into force, planning permission should not normally be granted.”
“Neighbourhood plans should consider providing indicative delivery timetables, and allocating reserve sites to ensure that emerging evidence of housing need is addressed. This can help minimise potential conflicts and ensure that policies in the neighbourhood plan are not overridden by a new Local Plan.”
Saturday, 13 February 2016
Buckland Newton - submitted for its examination
Buckland Newton have taken the next step towards finalising their neighbourhood plan. The proposed plan has been submitted to West Dorset District Council, and the District Council have agreed that it can proceed to examination.
The neighbourhood plan takes forward the aspirations identified in the Parish Plan, and proposes a range of small housing sites mainly around the larger settlement of Buckland Newton, but also some very small scale development in the hamlets. Most of the sites are put forward as rural exception sites, to ensure that they will provide some affordable housing (as they are under the now withdrawn '10 unit' affordable housing threshold proposed nationally). The plan also sets out housing type and design criteria as well as safeguarding the key community spaces and places in the parish, and allocating a site for a new recreation area.
Will be keeping track on their progress over the coming months...
Will be keeping track on their progress over the coming months...
Thursday, 21 January 2016
The NPPF proposed changes got a new angle added today...
I mentioned in passing, but didn't specifically comment on, the strengthening of the 'presumption in favour of brownfield land' that would be included (with its caveat of overriding conflicts with the Local Plan or National Planning Policy that cannot be mitigated).
Anyone got a large garden in the countryside? Well if you have, following on from today's High Court judgement, you own some land that, being outside of “built-up areas” is brownfield land. Paragraph 111 of the NPPF says that brownfield land is where development ought to be prioritised, and the proposed changes could make this an even more forceful argument.
Sound like sustainable development to you? Sometimes I think I must be living in a comedy sketch - you couldn't make it up!
I mentioned in passing, but didn't specifically comment on, the strengthening of the 'presumption in favour of brownfield land' that would be included (with its caveat of overriding conflicts with the Local Plan or National Planning Policy that cannot be mitigated).
Anyone got a large garden in the countryside? Well if you have, following on from today's High Court judgement, you own some land that, being outside of “built-up areas” is brownfield land. Paragraph 111 of the NPPF says that brownfield land is where development ought to be prioritised, and the proposed changes could make this an even more forceful argument.
Sound like sustainable development to you? Sometimes I think I must be living in a comedy sketch - you couldn't make it up!
Thursday, 14 January 2016
NPPF changes consultation (22 February 2016) - you may want to say something...
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/national-planning-policy-consultation-on-proposed-changes
The following is a very brief run-through of what I have picked out as key issues for some of my clients…
Affordable housing - broadening the definition to include any affordable products for rent or for ownership, and lifting the requirement that all of these products would have to be affordable ‘in perpetuity’ or have the money released recycled back into providing further affordable housing.
and
The following is a very brief run-through of what I have picked out as key issues for some of my clients…
Affordable housing - broadening the definition to include any affordable products for rent or for ownership, and lifting the requirement that all of these products would have to be affordable ‘in perpetuity’ or have the money released recycled back into providing further affordable housing.
and
Starter homes –
making clearer that these should be considered on underused or unviable
commercial / employment sites and rural exception sites. These would be subject to the same minimum
time limits on resale (5 years) as other starter homes but local planning
authorities could, exceptionally, require a local connection test for example
where access to the housing market for working people can be difficult and
would be consistent with existing policy on rural exception sites. Also make clear that Neighbourhood Plans can
allocate Starter Home sites in the Green Belt.
These two changes will
bring in more options by which affordable homes could provide a suitable
solution, but it will be important for those groups preparing neighbourhood
plans to be clear whether specific local connection or other issues might be
required, and have evidence to support this.
Brownfield sites
– strengthening the ‘presumption’ in favour of brownfield land unless there are
overriding conflicts with the Local Plan or National Planning Policy that
cannot be mitigated.
Small sites (of less
than 10 units) adjoining settlement boundaries – making clear that proposals
for development on such sites should be supported if they are sustainable.
The consideration of
small sites adjoining settlement boundaries could mean that some sites that
were dismissed in neighbourhood plans could still come forward for open market
housing, which may mean that some neighbourhood plan groups will feel that
their ability to shape future development is effectively undermined.
Housing delivery test
- introducing a new measurement for under-delivery possibly based on
completions compared to the housing targets (or trajectories), and requiring
the local planning authority to identify additional sustainable sites if the
existing approach is considerable below the housing required through a rapid
and targeted plan review.
This is unlikely to be
a key issue for more rural parts, but could have implications for sites around
the main towns, though any ‘quick’ allocations would still need to go through
consultation and examination.
Commuter hubs and
higher density housing – where there is a rail interchange that has, or
could have in the future, a frequent (15 minutes at peak times) service to that
stop, local planning authorities should require higher density housing
development.
Interesting choice of
wording – although I don’t think there are any places outside of the
conurbation in Dorset where this could apply, it could be argued that
everywhere is a possibility!
If the above raises any concerns, it is worth putting in a response to the consultation, rather than hoping that others will...
Monday, 4 January 2016
North Dorset Local Plan - plain sailing up to April
Yes - it arrived in the Christmas post! Dated 17 December the Inspector's report concludes the plan is sound, subject to the main modifications that were aired in the summer.
In particular with regard to the new housing need data, he concludes that "Taken as a whole… the benefits of adopting a plan that will be subject to early review, outweigh the disbenefits of relying on the 2012 SHMA.”
So provided that there are no hiccups between now and the Full Council meeting, the District Council can rest on its laurels of having the most up to date Local Plan in Dorset. Not that the planners can rest for long, as the early review means starting by April this year, and may inevitably require more sites to be found in light of the housing need for the future.
In particular with regard to the new housing need data, he concludes that "Taken as a whole… the benefits of adopting a plan that will be subject to early review, outweigh the disbenefits of relying on the 2012 SHMA.”
So provided that there are no hiccups between now and the Full Council meeting, the District Council can rest on its laurels of having the most up to date Local Plan in Dorset. Not that the planners can rest for long, as the early review means starting by April this year, and may inevitably require more sites to be found in light of the housing need for the future.
Monday, 7 December 2015
North Dorset Local Plan and housing numbers update
For those of us that are keeping an eye on when the Examiner's report on the North Dorset Local Plan will be published, there has been some interesting updates in the last month on the latest figures emerging on housing needs for the area, leading to an exchange between the Inspector and the District Council.
The Inspector has been made aware that the Eastern Dorset 2015 SHMA which assessed the likely housing need for the housing market area is to be published soon. From the information available it seems that it concludes that the objectively assessed need for North Dorset is 330 dwellings a year – compared to the earlier SHMA estimate of 285. So a 15% uplift in total. Obviously no decision as yet where this might be allocated - particularly as the 330 dwellings is an indicative split across the housing market area, and depending on the capacity and constraints, this may need to go up or down under the combined Council's Duty to Cooperate.
The District Council are keen to get their Plan regarded nonetheless, and press ahead with starting their review straight away (they say they will start by 31 March 2016). It does signal that there is likely to be more housing land required, and that this would need to be identified and allocated in the review (if there isn't sufficient supply coming forward above that already identified by the District Council).
Will we get to see Inspector David Hogger's final report before Christmas? And see the details in the SHMA? Watch this space...
UPDATE - the housing needs report is in fact already on the Purbeck section of the Dorset Council's website - click here to view - the graph on page 197 (shown below) illustrates the different requirements. Both Purbeck and North Dorset have a significant chunk of their need to support the likely employment growth in the area (which would otherwise be stalled by lack of employees, or lead to higher levels of commuting). The 330 suggested annual figure for housing in North Dorset does not include residential care homes which if included would add on a further 17 units a year to this figure.
The Inspector has been made aware that the Eastern Dorset 2015 SHMA which assessed the likely housing need for the housing market area is to be published soon. From the information available it seems that it concludes that the objectively assessed need for North Dorset is 330 dwellings a year – compared to the earlier SHMA estimate of 285. So a 15% uplift in total. Obviously no decision as yet where this might be allocated - particularly as the 330 dwellings is an indicative split across the housing market area, and depending on the capacity and constraints, this may need to go up or down under the combined Council's Duty to Cooperate.
The District Council are keen to get their Plan regarded nonetheless, and press ahead with starting their review straight away (they say they will start by 31 March 2016). It does signal that there is likely to be more housing land required, and that this would need to be identified and allocated in the review (if there isn't sufficient supply coming forward above that already identified by the District Council).
Will we get to see Inspector David Hogger's final report before Christmas? And see the details in the SHMA? Watch this space...
UPDATE - the housing needs report is in fact already on the Purbeck section of the Dorset Council's website - click here to view - the graph on page 197 (shown below) illustrates the different requirements. Both Purbeck and North Dorset have a significant chunk of their need to support the likely employment growth in the area (which would otherwise be stalled by lack of employees, or lead to higher levels of commuting). The 330 suggested annual figure for housing in North Dorset does not include residential care homes which if included would add on a further 17 units a year to this figure.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)